To Tell the Players . . .

. . . you need a scorecard.

Remember when al Qaeda was the enemy? The rationale for invading Iraq and Afghanistan? Remember?

That was before the U.S. backed an al Qaeda faction in Libya to overthrow 1970's dictator bogeyman, Muammar Qaddafi. Now, al Qaeda insurgents in Syria are heroes.

Ed Husain has written an article published on the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) site. He says,

The Syrian rebels would be immeasurably weaker today without al-Qaeda in their ranks. By and large, Free Syrian Army (FSA) battalions are tired, divided, chaotic, and ineffective. Feeling abandoned by the West, rebel forces are increasingly demoralized as they square off with the Assad regime's superior weaponry and professional army. Al-Qaeda fighters, however, may help improve morale. The influx of jihadis brings discipline, religious fervor, battle experience from Iraq, funding from Sunni sympathizers in the Gulf, and most importantly, deadly results. In short, the FSA needs al-Qaeda now.

This is significant because the CFR has directed U.S. foreign policy since the end of WWII. Isn't it interesting how al Qaeda started out as a CIA client to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, then they transformed into the specter of worldwide terrorism, and now they're the good guys, again.

Husain says that the U.S. will deal with al Qaeda after the overthrow of Syria's Assad.

Well, if al Qaeda no longer occupies the center of attention in the war on terrorism, who replaced them? If you read Christian Warrior Online regularly, you have displaced them as the greatest threat.

A faculty member of the University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Fort Leavenworth has produced a paper in which he lays out U.S. military strategy for suppressing Tea Party insurgents. Unbelievable? Read the scenario he spins in this excerpt:

The Great Recession of the early twenty-first century lasts far longer than anyone anticipated. After a change in control of the White House and Congress in 2012, the governing party cuts off all funding that had been dedicated to boosting the economy or toward relief. The United States economy has flatlined, much like Japan’s in the 1990s, for the better part of a decade. By 2016, the economy shows signs of reawakening, but the middle and lower-middle classes have yet to experience much in the way of job growth or pay raises. Unemployment continues to hover perilously close to double digits, small businesses cannot meet bankers’ terms to borrow money, and taxes on the middle class remain relatively high. A high-profile and vocal minority has directed the public’s fear and frustration at nonwhites and immigrants. After almost ten years of race-baiting and immigrant-bashing by right-wing demagogues, nearly one in five Americans reports being vehemently opposed to immigration, legal or illegal, and even U.S.-born nonwhites have become occasional targets for mobs of angry whites.

In May 2016 an extremist militia motivated by the goals of the “tea party” movement takes over the government of Darlington, South Carolina, occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council, and placing the mayor under house arrest. Activists remove the chief of police and either disarm local police and county sheriff departments or discourage them from interfering. In truth, this is hardly necessary. Many law enforcement officials already are sympathetic to the tea party’s agenda, know many of the people involved, and have made clear they will not challenge the takeover. The militia members are organized and have a relatively well thought-out plan of action. ("Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A “Vision” of the Future")

The Establishment denies that the armed forces are training to suppress Americans, to seize private firearms, to arrest and detain those who oppose tyranny. (See here and here)  But this document shows that this is part of the policy and planning process within the military establishment.

Is the President a CIA Plant?

Was Barack "Barry Sotero" Obama really born in Kenya, or does that story merely provide a diversion from a much more sinister political power play? Watch the video below and make up your own mind.

Search Engine Co. Blocks Weapons Search, Sales

A certain search engine company which I shall not name (but it starts with "G" and rhymes with frugal), has a new policy that discriminates against any products related to firearms. The internet giant has a rep for manipulating results of unapproved searches and censoring websites unfriendly to the liberal establishment.


Today, they routed an email critical of their company directly to my spam folder. The email contained a link to the news article about the company's new antigun policy.


A coincidence? I think not.

Here's a link to the offending article:

http://tinyit.cc/939b 


To perform searches that are not traceable by the "frugal" people or anyone else, try using the search engine ixquick.com 

"Honest" Politician Admits She Lied to Get Elected

You want the truth? You can't handle the truth. (Jack Nicholson's character in A Few Good Men)

That's basically what Mayor McShurley of Muncie Indiana told constituents in an interview. She pretty much summed up the whole political situation, local state and national.

The real policymakers behind the scenes use this to their advantage.

To read more, click here.

Humanitarian Invasion of Uganda

Earlier this year, U.S. policymakers gave aid & cover for Libyan insurgents in a humanitarian move to put control of that nation's government in the hands of a branch of Al Qaeda. Now elitists want another humanitarian military intervention -- this time in Uganda.

It seems that Joseph Kony,  a small-time Ugandan warlord, has murdered some 2,400 people and conscripted some 3,400 youth into his private army. Last year, President Obama sent military advisors to Uganda to help the government deal with this travesty.

Now, a trendy liberal video has gone viral that calls for the U.S. to do more to see this criminal arrested and tried before an international tribunal. (See here)

Okay, Kony is a bad guy. I get that. He's a blight on humanity.

But let's put this in perspective. For years now, Muslims have attacked & killed many thousands of African Christians in Sudan (See here) and Nigeria (See here). One source cites a million African Christians killed by Islamists in the 20th Century. (To see source, CLICK HERE)

Or, how about U.N. troops that have been involved in murder and rape going back as far as the 1960's? (See here and here)

Why this sudden interest in a local Ugandan gangster when much greater atrocities abound? Perhaps the  following news item from last year will shed some light on the question:

Large Oil Reserves Discovered in Uganda, Troops Sent for 'Humanitarian Intervention'

It looks as though elitists whose hearts figuratively bleed for the downtrodden of the Middle East (and who have sent young Americans to bleed literally) have now decided that it's worth the sacrifice of more American lives to relieve the plight of Uganda.

Yeah, right.

One More 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

JWC sent me a link to this documentary video on the World Trade Center attacks. After watching the hour-and-a-half presentation, I feel inclined to side with over 1500 engineers who have weighed the evidence and said that the official story just could not have happened.

It's sad but true that a soundbite mentality deprives many, if not most, of the ability to focus for 90 minutes. But I have provided a couple of shorter videos in a previous post to at least pique (not peak, please) readers' curiosity. Additionally, I believe a sizable segment of my readers are above average and can maintain focus long enough to watch the documentary. (Click on link in first line above.)

After considering the odd fact that two planes brought down three buildings in a totally uncharacteristic fashion, the following possibility occurred to me: A third plane was supposed to crash into the building number seven. When the third plane did not materialize, the plot had unfolded too far, and they felt forced to detonate the charges in building seven.

If my hypothetical  proposition were correct, Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was meant to crash into WTC 7. Wikipedia says, "Although the evidence remains inconclusive, it is widely presumed the intended target was the United States Capitol Washington, D.C."

Below you will see a map which appears in the Wikipedia article. It shows a sharp turn from its westerly course after the hijackers took over. This makes it look as though it's headed for Washington D.C. But then, there's a course correction that points it in the direction of New York City.

I believe the third turn came shortly before the crash and represents either loss of control as the passengers stormed the cockpit (official story) or evasive action before military planes shot it down (one conspiracy version).

So, does my "conspiracy theory" have merit? I don't have any hard evidence to support it, so I'm just putting it out there for your consideration. And if you think it's an idea that's really out there, that's okay, too.

For an idea of how major media sources suppress the 9/11 conspiracy researchers and writers, see this article:

Wikipedia's 9/11 'Edit Wars' | 911Blogger.com - Likewise, readers have repeatedly turned to the article “9/11 Conspiracy Theories.” The article — similarly detailed with 299 footnotes purporting to explain accusations of faked video footage or controlled demolition of the two ...

U.S. Gov't Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks?

I hesitate to categorically state that elements of the U.S. government actively engaged in the planning/execution of the 9/11 attacks. Ten years ago, as I watched and wept, I did not immediately connect the Muslim terrorists with  the Machiavellian political machinations in Washington.

Since that time, however, many anomalies have come to light -- anomalies which the political and media establishments have deliberately covered up. It makes me wonder what they are trying to hide.

I've watched some long videos that pile up evidence against the truthfulness of the official story. Here are a couple of short ones that do a good job of revealing the chasm between the establishment version and what seems to have really happened.

The first video contains one doo-doo word near the end.